I am trying to understand the scientific method of reaching a conclusion of a anomaly. Is the theory first or the hypothesis? I will always go with observation first, but hypothesis then theory then test then final argument. How about spiritualism as a anomaly. The only proof is the person who had the experience be it (oobe) or in the body experience, excluding miracles. I have seen where people question people who have had these experiences as mentally ill drugs or delusions illusions or hallucinations.
Did the first theosophist (and those who followed them have any experiences with the spiritual or esoteric side? Material man cannot or will not accept there is any (spiritual nature). Paul
That's great Joe! I may be taking a trip up there next week, not before taking a dip in the Healing Springs in Truth or Consequences on the way up. Then off to take the lil' family out to the Zoo and Aquarium in your area, it may be possible to meet up while I'm there, it'd be a pleasure to meet with a fellow member over a hot cup of Jo' no pun intended hah!