
Started this discussion. Last reply by Paul lee James May 13. 6 Replies 0 Likes
Started this discussion. Last reply by Jeffrey Smart May 13. 12 Replies 0 Likes
Posted on April 15, 2013 at 8:00am 3 Comments 1 Like
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 1:55pm 46 Comments 1 Like
Posted on November 24, 2012 at 11:00pm 2 Comments 2 Likes
Posted on November 24, 2012 at 9:30am 6 Comments 3 Likes
Theosophy
A Quick Reference:
External References:
All comments and submissions subject to our Terms of Service and Rules of the Road.
Have you?
➢ Become a Member
➢ Invited Your Friends
➢ Read/ Written a Blog
➢ Read/ Posted on the Forums
➢ Checked out the Chat
➢ Joined our Facebook Group
➢ Joined our Facebook Page
© 2013 Created by TheosNet.

Comment Wall (139 comments)
You need to be a member of Theosophy.Net to add comments!
Join Theosophy.Net
Hello Joe
Joe,
I am trying to understand the scientific method of reaching a conclusion of a anomaly. Is the theory first or the hypothesis? I will always go with observation first, but hypothesis then theory then test then final argument. How about spiritualism as a anomaly. The only proof is the person who had the experience be it (oobe) or in the body experience, excluding miracles. I have seen where people question people who have had these experiences as mentally ill drugs or delusions illusions or hallucinations.
Did the first theosophist (and those who followed them have any experiences with the spiritual or esoteric side? Material man cannot or will not accept there is any (spiritual nature). Paul
That's great Joe! I may be taking a trip up there next week, not before taking a dip in the Healing Springs in Truth or Consequences on the way up. Then off to take the lil' family out to the Zoo and Aquarium in your area, it may be possible to meet up while I'm there, it'd be a pleasure to meet with a fellow member over a hot cup of Jo' no pun intended hah!
View All Comments